Toolchanger Classes
Conventional toolchangers
Full conventional
The whole toolhead travels. Each tool carries its own extruder motor, gears, fans, heat break and control board, so the only thing broken at a change is the link back to the mainboard.
Pros
- One connection to break and remake.
- Tools are self-contained, so one can be built or debugged on its own.
- Nothing is shared between tools, so a fault stays in one tool.
Cons
- A tool costs a whole toolhead.
- Most mass to accelerate and to dock.
- Most parts per tool to keep calibrated.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| Prusa XL | Commercial printer |
| E3D toolchanger | Commercial toolhead |
| Stealthchanger | FOSS design |
| Tapchanger | FOSS design |
| Madam | FOSS design |
| Daksh | FOSS design |
| Lineux | FOSS design |
Partial conventional
The tool keeps the extruder and the hot end but leaves the part cooling fan on the carriage, along with some of the toolhead electronics.
Pros
- Cheaper per tool than a full toolhead.
- Part cooling and its duct never have to survive docking.
Cons
- Part cooling has to reach whatever tool is mounted.
- More connections cross the joint than in a full conventional.
Note
In the source figure the dashed boundary cuts through the toolhead board rather than around it. Read as: some tool electronics travel, some stay. Worth verifying against the real machine.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| U1 | Commercial printer |
Filament path changers
Gear swapping
The extruder motor stays on the carriage and the drive gears travel with the tool along with the hot end. The split is in the middle of the extruder.
Pros
- Motor mass stays off the tool.
- Cheaper tools than carrying a whole extruder.
Cons
- The drive coupling has to re-engage accurately every change.
- Filament stays loaded in the tool between changes.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| C5 series | Commercial printer |
Hotend fan swapping
The hot end travels with its own heat break fan. The extruder and part cooling stay behind, so filament is cut or retracted at the change.
Pros
- Small, cheap tools.
- Each hot end keeps the heat break fan it was designed around.
Cons
- Filament has to be pulled clear before a change and re-fed after.
- Fan power and the heater circuit both cross the joint.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| M1D | Commercial printer |
| A4T-C | FOSS design |
| MedusaHC | FOSS design |
Inductive / pogo changers
Only the heat break and nozzle travel. The heater and thermistor cross the joint through spring pins or an inductive coupling, so nothing is plugged in by hand.
Pros
- Smallest and cheapest tools of the filament path changers.
- No cable to route or manage per tool.
Cons
- The contact has to carry heater current for thousands of cycles.
- Dirt or oxide at the interface shows up as a heating fault.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| MX series | Commercial printer |
| INDX | Commercial toolhead |
| Quindecum | FOSS design |
Wired
The same split as inductive/pogo, but the heater and thermistor stay on a wire back to the board instead of crossing a contact.
Pros
- A crimped or soldered joint is more predictable than a contact.
- No pin wear.
Cons
- Each tool stays tethered, which limits where tools can be parked.
- Cable management gets harder with every tool added.
Note
Same swap set as inductive/pogo. The difference is how the heater/thermistor circuit crosses the boundary, not which blocks travel.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| Klitek | Commercial printer |
| CX Changer | FOSS design |
Hotend changers
AMS-assisted hotend changers
A hot end changer paired with an automatic material system. The AMS handles filament, so the tool only carries the heat break and nozzle.
Pros
- Filament handling and tool changing stay separate problems.
- Cheap tools.
Cons
- Depends on the AMS to feed and retract reliably.
- Purge and load time on every material change.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| Vortek | Commercial printer |
AMS-assisted nozzle changers
Only the nozzle is swapped. The heat break, fans and extruder all stay on the machine and the AMS feeds filament.
Pros
- The smallest and cheapest thing to duplicate per tool.
- Almost no mass added to the carriage.
Cons
- The nozzle joint has to seal at temperature every time.
- Everything upstream is shared, so tools can only differ in nozzle geometry.
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| Atomform | Commercial printer |
| Swapper3d | Commercial toolhead |
All systems
| Name | Origin |
|---|---|
| Prusa XL | Commercial printer |
| E3D toolchanger | Commercial toolhead |
| Stealthchanger | FOSS design |
| Tapchanger | FOSS design |
| Madam | FOSS design |
| Daksh | FOSS design |
| Lineux | FOSS design |
| U1 | Commercial printer |
| C5 series | Commercial printer |
| M1D | Commercial printer |
| A4T-C | FOSS design |
| MedusaHC | FOSS design |
| MX series | Commercial printer |
| INDX | Commercial toolhead |
| Quindecum | FOSS design |
| Klitek | Commercial printer |
| CX Changer | FOSS design |
| Vortek | Commercial printer |
| Atomform | Commercial printer |
| Swapper3d | Commercial toolhead |